http://tvweek.ninemsn.com.au/tvweek/interview.asp
Angel gets staked
Just weeks after the drama series Angel celebrated its 100th episode, fans were stunned to hear it had been quietly cancelled by the Warner Bros network. But for its star, David Boreanaz, it was not all bad news after five seasons of playing TV's vampire with a soul.
Were you shocked or surprised when you heard the show was cancelled?
I really wasn't shocked or surprised. This is the way the business is. Like I said when I started the show, I worked on scene to scene, show to show. My commitment to it was 22 episodes each season, and when that's done I'd consider it over. So it was actually a big relief for me and, personally, it gave me a big sense of freedom. I felt like a big weight had been lifted from my shoulders.
Why is that?
When you do 100 episodes and you're carrying a show, it's a lot of pressure. People rely on you for their jobs - the camera people, the craft services people, the lighting people. Yet you really owe it to yourself to examine what's right and what's wrong for you as an artist. I don't owe anybody anything - I owe myself and my family. So for me, I feel like, `Oh, I don't have to hold that cross anymore.' As heavy as it may be or as light as it may be, it's not a negative. It's a good thing!
How did you feel about the petition to save the show?
I felt bad for the fans. When the producers took the show and re-tooled it in a way that took it in a different direction, it should have been the responsibility of the network to put a keen interest into it during that time. So I don't think they handled it in the classiest way. And the fans are the people the network really screwed over.
Will you keep any of the props or memorabilia from the show?
I'll keep a few things, but nothing major. There aren't any of (Angel's) suits I'd wear.
You came back for the end of Buffy. Could Sarah Michelle Gellar come back for the Angel finale?
If it happened it would be great, but I'm not generally in favour of "reunions" because there is no reason to go back. It took a lot to get me to do Buffy. At one point I really didn't want to do it, but as a favour to Sarah I did it.
Is your wife (actress Jaime Bergman) pleased you'll be home more with her and your son?
She's not home that much either now her career is starting to bite. But I do hope to be home more with my wife and son because I'm not on set for nine months of the year. That is one thing about the show I won't miss.
to all of this i say, whatever. ass.
Angel gets staked
Just weeks after the drama series Angel celebrated its 100th episode, fans were stunned to hear it had been quietly cancelled by the Warner Bros network. But for its star, David Boreanaz, it was not all bad news after five seasons of playing TV's vampire with a soul.
Were you shocked or surprised when you heard the show was cancelled?
I really wasn't shocked or surprised. This is the way the business is. Like I said when I started the show, I worked on scene to scene, show to show. My commitment to it was 22 episodes each season, and when that's done I'd consider it over. So it was actually a big relief for me and, personally, it gave me a big sense of freedom. I felt like a big weight had been lifted from my shoulders.
Why is that?
When you do 100 episodes and you're carrying a show, it's a lot of pressure. People rely on you for their jobs - the camera people, the craft services people, the lighting people. Yet you really owe it to yourself to examine what's right and what's wrong for you as an artist. I don't owe anybody anything - I owe myself and my family. So for me, I feel like, `Oh, I don't have to hold that cross anymore.' As heavy as it may be or as light as it may be, it's not a negative. It's a good thing!
How did you feel about the petition to save the show?
I felt bad for the fans. When the producers took the show and re-tooled it in a way that took it in a different direction, it should have been the responsibility of the network to put a keen interest into it during that time. So I don't think they handled it in the classiest way. And the fans are the people the network really screwed over.
Will you keep any of the props or memorabilia from the show?
I'll keep a few things, but nothing major. There aren't any of (Angel's) suits I'd wear.
You came back for the end of Buffy. Could Sarah Michelle Gellar come back for the Angel finale?
If it happened it would be great, but I'm not generally in favour of "reunions" because there is no reason to go back. It took a lot to get me to do Buffy. At one point I really didn't want to do it, but as a favour to Sarah I did it.
Is your wife (actress Jaime Bergman) pleased you'll be home more with her and your son?
She's not home that much either now her career is starting to bite. But I do hope to be home more with my wife and son because I'm not on set for nine months of the year. That is one thing about the show I won't miss.
to all of this i say, whatever. ass.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 11:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 12:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 12:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 11:39 am (UTC)Seth & Summer forever. <3 (http://www.livejournal.com/users/ticklemeshelle/3129.html)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 12:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 11:47 am (UTC)never had much of an opinion of DB, prior to now. but, based on this... he's sort of a fuckwit, 'non? he basically is saying, 'whew, glad that's over!' - which, i'll allow, is his perogative. still... not very nice to the fans. one of those things you should think, but not say.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 12:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 12:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 12:32 pm (UTC)I'm telling you. He has a development deal. Carrying the show? A heavy cross? Oh, please.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 12:49 pm (UTC)Then he'd see he wasnt carrying anyone.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 12:33 pm (UTC)I dont know what to think of this interview
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 12:44 pm (UTC)To DB:
Pah! We snub thee! And all the other boys on the show are prettier, so there! Neeeeeener.
*ka-thoop, ping!*
I suppose he probably thinks he can still be Superman or something. To which, I laugh. Hah! Hah! Hah!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 01:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 01:18 pm (UTC)the only reason one would buy such magazine is because they lost their tvguide that comes free in the sunday papers. Its not even worth the paper that its printed on. Or the $2.50 that it is (or was - might have gone up) ... Or you have followed the link to their website
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 01:41 pm (UTC)And just what is he going to do for money? Does he think he can do movies that will actually earn money? Pffft. Apparently, he's expecting his wife to have all the earning power. What does he think he's going to get for a job, if not an occasional part on some sitcom? *shakes head*
I did like the fact that he acknowledged that the fans got screwed over. That, at least, was more than I've seen from a lot of interviews.
Hm. If he really felt this negative towards the show and the part, why the fuck is he still there? Angel without Angel probably wouldn't be all that bad.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 02:30 pm (UTC)Sheesh
Date: 2004-03-14 02:47 pm (UTC)Hope he's able to maintain that ludicrously high opinion of himself, cause if he keeps shooting his mouth off like that, all he's gonna have left is his own high opinion.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-14 05:26 pm (UTC)I think it was very stupid of him to say what he is saying. A lot of fans are fighting to get it to stay on the air. So now he's screwing the fans over which is not cool.